MAY 5 2016, ALMATY (The Conway Bulletin) — Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev bowed to public pressure and agreed to scrap unpopular land reforms which had sparked protests across the country.
Four days earlier, in a speech broadcast on national television, Mr Nazarbayev appeared determined to see off protests which had spread from Atyrau in west Kazakhstan, to Semey in the east and Kyzylorda in the south. He described the protesters as saboteurs who risked wrecking the country.
But with more protests planned, a clearly shaken Mr Nazarbayev told his government on Thursday that the plans would be delayed from their initial introduction on July 1 until the start of next year and, even then, only if the public agreed with the plans.
“The mechanisms and rules of the adopted law were not widely discussed with the public. The anxiety and concerns of the people are justified in many ways,” he said, according to a video posted on Facebook by his press office.
Analysts will either interpret this climb down as a humiliation for the 75-year-old leader who some say is increasingly out of touch with ordinary Kazakhs as they grapple with the frustrations of an economic downturn, or they will describe it as a masterstroke by an experienced leader able to paint himself as The- Father-of-the-People.
Certainly, Mr Nazarbayev was quick to blame others for the debacle.
He specifically said that economy minister Yerbolat Dossayev and agriculture minister Asylzhan Mamytbekov had failed to fulfil their brief.
“It should have been explained to the population that didn’t understand that there was no talk of any sale of our agricultural lands,” he said. “This means we failed to explain this point and to target those parts of the population which were concerned.”
Mr Dossayev resigned immediately and Mr Mamytbekov, the following day.
On the streets of Almaty it was easy to find people who were against the prospect of land reforms. “Renting land is wrong. Just wrong. It is the blood and sweat of our ancestors,” said Daniyar, a student.
By contrast, it wasn’t possible to find anybody who supported the proposed land reforms.
ENDS
Copyright ©The Conway Bulletin — all rights reserved
(News report from Issue No. 279, published on May 6 2016)