NOV. 4 2016 (The Conway Bulletin) — It’s not often that Kazakhstan gets praised for its prison system. Not very often at all.
And there is a reason for this. There have been improvements over the last few years but the overwhelming majority of its prisons are based on crumbling Soviet-era infrastructure accompanied by an uncompromising Soviet-era mindset. There is no Norwegian cuddliness here.
These are mainly cold, uncomfortable and dangerous places. Stories from Kazakh prisons are hooked on riots, Islamic extremism recruitment, hunger strikes and deaths — both suicides and apparent suicides.
It’s the same story across the rest of Central Asia. Human rights groups and the media criticise governments for not investing enough time or money into their prison systems and the governments get defensive.
Except in last week’s Financial Times, when Kazakhstan scored what must have been a wonderful piece of prison PR.
On a week-long trip to Kazakhstan, FT editor Lionel Barber wrote in a diary-style entry that he had been inspired by Jonathan Aitken, a British Conservative politician who went to jail for perjury, to look around a Kazakh prison. Aitken had written glowingly about them in a book he’d been paid to write by Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev.
Barber was also impressed.
“It is unlikely to be wholly representative, compared with the former Soviet gulags in Kazakhstan. But its rooms are spotless; there are curtains and large glass window panes without bars, all of which would be seen as suicide risks elsewhere,” he said of prison 66/10 outside Astana which he was shown around.
Prison 66/10 is one of Kazakhstan’s new showcase prison and he knows it, but he also dangerously underplays the awfulness of most of the Kazakh prison system. Since 2011, when prisoners rioted and sliced open their stomachs in protest at the poor conditions, Kazakhstan has improved its prison system but perspective is needed.
Roger Boyes, a columnist at the London Times newspaper, picked up this theme. He said high-profile former politicians and visitors, such as Aitken and Tony Blair and Barber, were being used to whitewash Kazakhstan.
“He should have asked to see the basement,” Boyes wrote of Barber’s comments on Kazakh prison 66/10. “That’s where the truths are buried.”
By James Kilner, Editor, The Conway Bulletin
ENDS
Copyright ©The Conway Bulletin — all rights reserved
(News report from Issue No. 303, published on Nov. 4 2016)